From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17458 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2011 19:47:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17447 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2011 19:47:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:47:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9RJlSNK012776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:47:28 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9RJlRWu023949; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:47:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9RJlPig030272; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:47:26 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: John Steele Scott Cc: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] PR symtab/13277: Resolving opaque structures in ICC generated binaries. References: <4E9A6F3C.6010400@toojays.net> <20111019084011.GA9326@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111019090108.GA11862@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4EA3EBA9.1050204@toojays.net> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4EA3EBA9.1050204@toojays.net> (John Steele Scott's message of "Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:55:45 +1030") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00746.txt.bz2 John> I emailed Tom Tromey off-list about papers last week, but haven't John> heard back yet. I'd like to find the time to add test cases for this John> at some stage, so it would probably be a good idea to start on the John> paperwork stuff. Oops, sorry about this. I'm usually more on top of things. Tom