From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16629 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2011 21:44:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 16615 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2011 21:44:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_SM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:44:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB5LiRUx004060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:44:28 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB5LiRf3021146; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:44:27 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB5LiQhR001211; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:44:26 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: asmwarrior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] avoid the crash of gdb+pretty printer on initialized local variables References: <4ED379D8.4060808@gmail.com> <4ED8534D.2050100@gmail.com> <4EDAD0B3.80505@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4EDAD0B3.80505@gmail.com> (asmwarrior@gmail.com's message of "Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:45:23 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == ext asmwarrior writes: Tom> I forget, something to do with not using the right gcc flag? >> My app was build with -O0 and -g, no extra flag is used. I mean a missing flag when building gdb. I vaguely recall a need for -fno-omit-frame-pointer, and that without this, gdb exceptions cause crashes. Tom