From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-86330-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18088 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 19:58:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 18073 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 19:58:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:57:46 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJJvLXO003613	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:57:21 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJJvLLI031772;	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:57:21 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBJJvJIf028513;	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:57:20 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,        Pedro Alves <alves.ped@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch+7.4] reread.exp 7.3->7.4 regression
References: <20111218115343.GB22534@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<201112191030.pBJAUsf4028428@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>	<m3hb0wo01t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<20111219190833.GA7476@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:02:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20111219190833.GA7476@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's	message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:08:33 +0100")
Message-ID: <m31us0nxls.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> The problem is that if one uses file A with separate debug info and
Jan> new file A no longer has split debug info then one (or more on OSX)
Jan> objfile will need to be removed anyway.  So `struct objfile *'
Jan> cannot work.

I still favor your original patch but at this point I am looking for a
compromise that would still improve the situation.

Tom