From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1749 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 12:12:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 1739 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 12:12:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:12:27 +0000 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3VYwtG0c6gz3hhbv; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:12:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-144-217.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.144.217]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3VYwtF6gbhz4KK2m; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:12:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9C1F8CA2A0; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:12:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" , , Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Apr 20 01:58:17 UTC 2012 References: <20120420015817.GA7169@sourceware.org> <4F90C4F7.10302@codesourcery.com> <20120420043807.GI2852@adacore.com> <83d372ivjh.fsf@gnu.org> <43835.7730432928$1334919059@news.gmane.org> X-Yow: Now I'm having INSIPID THOUGHTS about the beautiful, round wives of HOLLYWOOD MOVIE MOGULS encased in PLEXIGLASS CARS and being approached by SMALL BOYS selling FRUIT.. Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <43835.7730432928$1334919059@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:50:02 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2 "Pierre Muller" writes: > I have no opinion on the removal of this rule, > I would just like to be sure that, > if we allow to use inline function, > the configure step will correctly define inline as nothing > on systems using compilers that do not support inline functions. > > Does anyone know if this is done inside GDB configuration step? AC_C_INLINE in gdb/configure.ac. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."