From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
To: jtc@redback.com
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>,
RDBrown@mira.net, RodneyBrown@mynd.com,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: gdb/corefile.c (0401 snap on HP-UX).
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2k84s3wt1.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5mwv8s8diu.fsf@jtc.redback.com>
jtc@redback.com (J.T. Conklin) writes:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:
> >> I'm not sure that I like this patch, but I'm not sure I can come up
> >> with a resonable alternative in the short term. Perhaps the code to
> >> find the symbol file cooresponding to the core file (this is the bit
> >> that needs symfile_objfile) should be replaced with a config specific
> >> hook. But because it is also wrapped with HPUXHPPA, I'm not opposed
> >> to checking this in now, and fixing it up later.
>
> Dan> Please don't.
>
> See my response to Kevin. In short, I'm not going to.
>
Just got it.
> Dan> The idea is not to *add* things wrapped with HPUXHPPA, rather,
> Dan> remove them. Pretending they will be fixed up later isn't a
> Dan> good idea. They haven't been thus far. There is no indication
> Dan> this will change.
>
> You don't need to lecture me about this.
Okey dokey, sorry about that.
> I've been one of the most
> vocal critics about adding cruft believing the fiction we'll fix it
> later.
It's not just cruft, too, as i'm sure you know. There are whole
targets and language support modules that never got fixed "later".
:)
> This is why I asked for further comments instead of commit-
> ing the patch as is.
>
> --jtc
>
> --
> J.T. Conklin
> RedBack Networks
--
I was going to tape some records onto a cassette, but I got the
wires backwards. I erased all of the records. When I returned
them to my friend, he said, "Hey, these records are all blank."
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-10 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-09 6:03 RDBrown
2001-04-09 10:17 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-04-10 17:46 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-04-12 9:40 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-04-09 10:24 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-04-10 16:14 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-04-10 17:51 ` J.T. Conklin
2001-04-10 21:06 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2k84s3wt1.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu \
--to=dan@cgsoftware.com \
--cc=RDBrown@mira.net \
--cc=RodneyBrown@mynd.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jtc@redback.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox