At Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:04:58 +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > [1 ] > A result of ccr and exr mistakes by a "info registers" of h8300 target. > There was two faults. > > - A name of E_CCR_REGNUM is not defined with h8300_register_name. > Accordingly regcache_raw_read of h8300_pseudo_regitser_read fails. > - Assume size of E_PSEUDO_CCR_REGNUM by 1 byte with h8300_register_type. > But assume 4 bytes from a remote target. > Accordingly cannot take response of remote side to be really. > > I correct an issue of a thing of the patch box which I attached. > The issue was corrected, but not know you whether this is good technique. > > -- > Yoshinori Sato > > I modified it in technique to think that I was appropriate. -- Yoshinori Sato