Re: [RFA] Revised C++ ABI abstraction patches

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com>]

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

> Jim,
> 
> When Dan originally submitted his original patch it was large. 
> Fortunatly it was only (mostly) the mechanical change of separating out
> the C++ stuff (it was also approved so I don't know why it wasn't
> committed). 

It wasn't committed because it needed a little work.

By the time i finished the work, it had grown. Feature creep.
:(


> Now, however, the patch has managed to accumulate much much
> more (sigh).  This really should be broken down into the mechanical
> change of creating a new file and the modifications that fix real
> bugs.

Yup.

Should I break it into the addition of the new files, and the others
changes?

Unfortunately, they'll be dependent on each other, but i can't think
of how to break it up so it isn't.




> 
> 	enjoy,
> 		Andrew