From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18212 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 12:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18205 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 12:03:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 12:03:46 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3219145B7; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:03:45 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to schwab@suse.de using -f To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Should we fix warnings from GCC 2.xx? References: X-Yow: Hello. Just walk along and try NOT to think about your INTESTINES being almost FORTY YARDS LONG!! From: Andreas Schwab Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 05:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:46:58 +0200 (IST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (ia64-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: |> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote: |> |> > |> FWIW, I'm still using GCC 2.7.2.1 on one of my machines. |> > |> > GCC 2.7 does not have this warning in the first place. |> |> IIRC, it does. It does have -Wparentheses, but it doesn't warn about braces. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."