From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-47153-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20108 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2007 17:15:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 20099 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2007 17:15:58 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ns1.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:15:48 +0000
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E15124E0 	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:15:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc, frame] Always check for unsaved PC
References: <20060819161139.GC25238@nevyn.them.org> 	<200608201427.k7KERnD0001824@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> 	<20061110201548.GA1115@nevyn.them.org> <jevejdh69d.fsf@sykes.suse.de> 	<20070111164533.GA20499@nevyn.them.org>
X-Yow: Did I SELL OUT yet??
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:15:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20070111164533.GA20499@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's 	message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:45:33 -0500")
Message-ID: <jer6u1h4ce.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:34:22PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> This is broken.  You can't use PC_REGNUM unconditionally without checking
>> whether that register actually exists.  The ia64 does not have such a
>> register.
>
> I assume it causes trouble there.  Sorry.  Does this help (untested)?

Yes, thanks, this fixes about 200 regressions.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."