Re: [PATCH/RFA] Update m68k function return value handling

Andreas Schwab
2004-05-04T13:13:05Z

Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> writes:

> FYI, there's 80 or more fails for an m68k-elf cross target.
> I'm not sure if it's better or worse with your patch.
> Andreas, it seems like some of your recent changes (last six
> months or so) have broken the cross target.

The last time I changed something for m68k was on 2003-09-25, which is
already more than 6 months ago. The biggest changes of mine happend about
one year ago, with another batch about 8 months ago, where I converted the
m68k backend to move away from the deprecated interfaces.

Would it be possible for you to find out which changes are bad? I have
them all tested natively on m68k-linux as much as possible.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, MaxfeldstraÃŸe 5, 90409 NÃ¼rnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."