From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21763 invoked by alias); 4 May 2004 13:13:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21750 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 13:13:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2004 13:13:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EDC53E8D5; Tue, 4 May 2004 15:13:04 +0200 (CEST) To: Michael Snyder Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Update m68k function return value handling References: <200405022152.i42Lq2nc000394@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <200405032156.i43LuGv8009496@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4096F7E6.2080805@redhat.com> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: With this weapon I can expose fictional characters and bring about sweeping reforms!! Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 13:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4096F7E6.2080805@redhat.com> (Michael Snyder's message of "Tue, 04 May 2004 01:54:46 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder writes: > FYI, there's 80 or more fails for an m68k-elf cross target. > I'm not sure if it's better or worse with your patch. > Andreas, it seems like some of your recent changes (last six > months or so) have broken the cross target. The last time I changed something for m68k was on 2003-09-25, which is already more than 6 months ago. The biggest changes of mine happend about one year ago, with another batch about 8 months ago, where I converted the m68k backend to move away from the deprecated interfaces. Would it be possible for you to find out which changes are bad? I have them all tested natively on m68k-linux as much as possible. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."