From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-48027-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22700 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2007 11:35:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 22686 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2007 11:35:11 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:35:02 +0000
Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264E7215DF; 	Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:35:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "pedro alves" <alves.ped@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [New WinCE support] [patch 4/4] The bulk of the code.
References: <20070315235008.243411000@portugalmail.pt> 	<45F9FC33.9020106@portugalmail.pt> <uy7lxnydu.fsf@gnu.org> 	<4053daab0703160803s3edf1294sfcdf4f8319787ab7@mail.gmail.com> 	<uslc4nmmu.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Yow: I wonder if there's anything GOOD on tonight?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:35:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <uslc4nmmu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Mar 	2007 13:19:05 +0200")
Message-ID: <jelkhww1b0.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:03:21 +0000
>> From: "pedro alves" <alves.ped@gmail.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> 
>> When someone later uses errno as an lvalue, it breaks WinCE again.
>
> I think such usage of errno is a bad idea anyway, since on many
> platforms errno is a function already (to support multi-threading).

Even then errno continues to be an lvalue, as required by POSIX.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."