From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27391 invoked by alias); 27 May 2008 19:20:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27378 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2008 19:20:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ns.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:19:58 +0000 Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0727D4155C; Tue, 27 May 2008 21:19:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix frame-args.exp failure References: <200805271816.m4RIGO4D022560@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-Yow: Everybody gets free BORSCHT! Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200805271816.m4RIGO4D022560@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Tue, 27 May 2008 20:16:24 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00721.txt.bz2 "Ulrich Weigand" writes: > Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> > Wouldn't this make any optimized-out locals be treated like frame >> > arguments? And also see print_frame_arg_vars. I thought there was an >> > "is an argument" flag on variables nowadays but it doesn't look like >> > it. >> >> How about this instead? Tested on ppc-linux. > > Did you get a chance to test with non-DWARF-2 debug info as well > (at least stabs would be nice to test)? I did some checks using the frame-args test with -gstabs. It has a different issue in that the arguments s and u are shown, but with bogus contents (but this is not a regression). > ... these, which appear to be unrelated changes? Oops, forgot to clean them out. (There is a bug about calling objc methods which I was also working on, but those changes don't fix it yet.) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."