From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16491 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2005 22:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15817 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2005 22:36:00 -0000 Received: from ns.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:36:00 +0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E86EEFF; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:35:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PR threads/2015: Fix adjust_pc_after_break for thread debugging References: <200509272218.j8RMIhj1022989@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-Yow: I guess you guys got BIG MUSCLES from doing too much STUDYING! Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200509272218.j8RMIhj1022989@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:18:43 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis writes: > I'd really like to see this tested on some more systems though, > especially on systems where adjust_pc_after_break is a no-op and > systems with software single-step. When adjust_pc_after_break is a no-op then my patch has obviously no effect at all. The testcase works just fine on those systems (tested ia64 and ppc). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."