From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24069 invoked by alias); 3 May 2004 21:21:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24058 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 21:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2004 21:21:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0815367D7; Mon, 3 May 2004 23:21:05 +0200 (CEST) To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Update m68k function return value handling References: <200405022152.i42Lq2nc000394@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: We just joined the civil hair patrol! Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 21:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200405022152.i42Lq2nc000394@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Sun, 2 May 2004 23:52:02 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis writes: > Anyway, are the Linux changes OK with you? Thanks, they look OK. I have sucessfully built it natively on m68k-linux and ran a few tests, no failures. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."