From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60919-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16597 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2009 12:21:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 16589 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2009 12:21:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:21:17 +0000
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A89047C5B; 	Wed,  7 Jan 2009 13:21:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: some news about the x86_64-windows port...
References: <20090107105848.GM3664@adacore.com> 	<200901071130.n07BUctK004303@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
X-Yow: I would like to urinate in an OVULAR, porcelain pool --
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:21:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200901071130.n07BUctK004303@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark 	Kettenis's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:30:38 +0100 (CET)")
Message-ID: <jeaba3nw7a.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2

Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:

>> --- a/gdb/configure.ac
>> +++ b/gdb/configure.ac
>> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ AC_FUNC_ALLOCA
>>  AC_FUNC_MMAP
>>  AC_FUNC_VFORK
>>  AC_CHECK_FUNCS([canonicalize_file_name realpath getrusage getuid \
>> -                getgid poll pread64 sbrk setpgid setpgrp setsid \
>> +                getgid kill poll pread64 sbrk setpgid setpgrp setsid \
>>  		sigaction sigprocmask sigsetmask socketpair syscall \
>>  		ttrace wborder setlocale])
>
> Why the hell do we need to add a check for a function defined by ISO C90?

I think you are mixing that with raise, C90 does not have kill.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."