From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23065 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2002 16:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23058 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 16:21:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 16:21:10 -0000 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B941ECFB; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:21:10 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to schwab@suse.de using -f To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update References: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> <20020427202525.A8877@nevyn.them.org> <20020427203648.A9559@nevyn.them.org> <3CCD7260.8050207@cygnus.com> <20020429123114.A3501@nevyn.them.org> <3CCD8AD4.2070807@cygnus.com> X-Yow: .. If I cover this entire WALL with MAZOLA, who I have to give my AGENT ten per cent?? From: Andreas Schwab Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3CCD8AD4.2070807@cygnus.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:03:00 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.2.50 (ia64-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01155.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: |> >> Yes, definitly closed. |> >> I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch |> >> once unfrozen. The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't |> >> broke don't fix it :-) |> > By ``works'' you mean doesn't build? :) See above; 5.2 won't build on |> > S/390. |> |> My understanding of Andreas's original post is that it updated things to |> current wisdom rather than fixed a pre-existing build problem. Sloppy phrasing, sorry. The current wisdom includes that linux-proc.o has to be linked in. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."