From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Long double support on m68k
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 01:43:00 -0000
Message-id: <je66cgkrlt.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
References: <jepuaqs8l2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <3B5D8DEA.1040300@cygnus.com> <jehew2s3t1.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <3B5DF2C3.6030609@cygnus.com> <je3d7lqv7b.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <3B5EE8BE.1040508@cygnus.com> <jevgkhm1tb.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <3B5F36C1.8030609@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00641.html

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

|> > The other thing it affects is `sizeof (long double)`.  For GCC, at least,
|> > |> is m68k's `sizeof (long double)` 12?
|> > Yes, of course.  That's why I started with this patch, a testsuite
|> > failure
|> > indicated that something was wrong.
|> 
|> 
|> Ah, thank you!  I was going to ask what effect this had on sizeof.exp but
|> I'll assume it was positive.
|> 
|> Yes, approved,

Thanks.  I'm not yet listed under Write After Approval in gdb/MAINTAINERS.
Should I add me?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5