From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14885-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21543 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2002 00:13:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21536 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2002 00:13:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2002 00:13:38 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9691E9AC
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 02:13:38 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to schwab@suse.de using -f
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update
References: <je662cu5mo.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org>
X-Yow: On SECOND thought, maybe I'll heat up some BAKED BEANS and
 watch REGIS PHILBIN..  It's GREAT to be ALIVE!!
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:13:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's
 message of "Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:24:08 -0400")
Message-ID: <je1yd0u1ch.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.2.50 (ia64-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01106.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

|> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 12:41:03AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > This updates the S390/S390x configuration to follow the latest wisdom.
|> > 
|> > 2002-04-28  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>
|> > 
|> > 	* config/s390/s390.mh (NATDEPFILES): Remove slib.o and
|> > 	core-regset.o, add linux-proc.o and gcore.o.
|> 
|> Er.... what?  Why remove solib.o and core-regset.o?

solib.o is in TDEPFILES, the same as all other linux targets.  But
removing core-regset.o was wrong.  Misunderstanding from my side, sorry.

|> Also, I bet you didn't build test this.

Of course, I did.  But I forgot to test corefile functionality.

Btw, config/i386/linux.mh NATDEPFILES lists linux-proc.o twice.

2002-04-28  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* config/s390/s390.mh (NATDEPFILES): Remove slib.o, add
	linux-proc.o and gcore.o.

--- gdb/config/s390/s390.mh	2002/04/27 18:51:58	1.1
+++ gdb/config/s390/s390.mh	2002/04/27 23:42:01
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ XM_FILE= xm-linux.h
 XM_CLIBS=
 
 NAT_FILE= nm-linux.h
-NATDEPFILES= infptrace.o solib.o inftarg.o fork-child.o corelow.o s390-nat.o core-aout.o core-regset.o
-# post 5.0 natdepfiles.
-NATDEPFILES+= thread-db.o lin-lwp.o proc-service.o 
+NATDEPFILES= infptrace.o inftarg.o fork-child.o corelow.o s390-nat.o \
+	core-aout.o core-regset.o linux-proc.o gcore.o thread-db.o lin-lwp.o \
+	proc-service.o
 LOADLIBES = -ldl -rdynamic
 
 

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."