From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59783-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25503 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2008 14:42:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 25456 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2008 14:42:27 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ns1.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:41:45 +0000
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE42D428C9; 	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:41:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Process record and replay, 8/10
References: <daef60380811052350v3232a91ep6241e687f2f18be@mail.gmail.com> 	<uljvvsg85.fsf@gnu.org> 	<daef60380811100628u7a774f8aod43edc7f0810145a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Yow: I want to so HAPPY, the VEINS in my neck STAND OUT!!
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:51:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <daef60380811100628u7a774f8aod43edc7f0810145a@mail.gmail.com> 	(teawater@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:28:24 +0800")
Message-ID: <je1vxj8wyh.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2

teawater <teawater@gmail.com> writes:

>>> +      /* arith & logic */
>>> +    case 0x00 ... 0x05:
>>> +    case 0x08 ... 0x0d:
>>> +    case 0x10 ... 0x15:
>>> +    case 0x18 ... 0x1d:
>>> +    case 0x20 ... 0x25:
>>> +    case 0x28 ... 0x2d:
>>> +    case 0x30 ... 0x35:
>>> +    case 0x38 ... 0x3d:
>>
>> Is this valid ISO C?
>
> I am not sure. Could you tell me?

Definitely not.  *Note (gcc)Case Ranges::.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."