From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31244 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2009 10:05:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31105 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2009 10:05:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:05:07 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NKqkh-0006Jl-Sr for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:05:03 +0100 Received: from lvk-gate.cmc.msu.ru ([212.192.248.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:05:03 +0100 Received: from vladimir by lvk-gate.cmc.msu.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:05:03 +0100 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: RE: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3] Followup-To: gmane.comp.gdb.patches Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <00d001ca265a$ddd0c800$99725800$@com> <4B27E619.8080607@vmware.com> <200912161106.12861.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <010001ca7e2c$7ce406e0$76ac14a0$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/4.3.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Jakob Engblom wrote: >> It does not seem like any of them were addressed. When they are addressed, >> this patch is OK. Because the only non-mechanical change is replacement of >> FIXME with a suitable comment, and reverse-mode experts are in much better >> position to decide if a comment captures the behaviour properly, I don't >> think I have to re-review any revision of this patch -- please commit directly >> when you think it's ready. > > I think they are. The latest file that Michael Snyder attached: > > * Is called "mi-reverse.exp" Per Michael's last message, it seems that he just attached wrong file when pinging, and this issue is now resolved. - Volodya