From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17230 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2009 20:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17220 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2009 20:24:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:23:59 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lc3or-0005Z3-Ce for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:23:57 +0000 Received: from mobius.qnx.com ([209.226.137.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:23:57 +0000 Received: from aristovski by mobius.qnx.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:23:57 +0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Aleksandar Ristovski Subject: Re: [patch] mips-tdep: info registers Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20090223020820.GC26056@adacore.com> <20090223025230.GA11699@caradoc.them.org> <200902230718.n1N7IoBD028396@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090223161756.GA19411@caradoc.them.org> <20090223162602.GH26056@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00476.txt.bz2 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > >> Joel, the attached removes numeric value syntax, but allows it for mips; mips >> will explicitly map regno to raw regno (which is currently 1-1). > > Is it really 1-1? I smell it may not be the case for the FP registers > (which are laid out differently depending on the FPU type and its current > configuration), but it might just be my memory playing tricks on me... > > Maciej > This particular patch I proposed deals only with gpr-s. Therefore, it will take care of info registers 0 to info registers 31 Outside of that, works as before.