Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> The problem is, this doesn't do what you want it to do.  It looks up
>>> GDB internal register number 1.  That just happens, at the moment,
>>> to match up with the raw register backing $at.  But it might change
>>> in the future.  It's not "the register named $1", which is what a
>>> MIPS user should expect.
>>
>> I agree, now, that we shouldn't have this feature. I can have a look
>> at removing it...
>>
> 
> Joel, the attached removes numeric value syntax, but allows it for mips; 
> mips will explicitly map regno to raw regno (which is currently 1-1).
> 
> I will let you take it from here.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleksandar Ristovski
> QNX Software Systems
> 

Reposting a diff generated with -up.