Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> The problem is, this doesn't do what you want it to do.  It looks up
>> GDB internal register number 1.  That just happens, at the moment,
>> to match up with the raw register backing $at.  But it might change
>> in the future.  It's not "the register named $1", which is what a
>> MIPS user should expect.
> 
> I agree, now, that we shouldn't have this feature. I can have a look
> at removing it...
> 

Joel, the attached removes numeric value syntax, but allows 
it for mips; mips will explicitly map regno to raw regno 
(which is currently 1-1).

I will let you take it from here.


Thanks,

Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems