From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32739 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2008 22:13:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32731 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2008 22:13:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:12:47 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KKKfQ-0000hZ-76 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:12:40 +0000 Received: from 201.82.124.180 ([201.82.124.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:12:40 +0000 Received: from bauerman by 201.82.124.180 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:12:40 +0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: Re: [RFA] iRe: [RFC][patch 1/9] initial Python support Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.288626880@br.ibm.com> <20080528205921.GA2969@caradoc.them.org> <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <20080719211241.GB4920@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 04:36:47PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> > Can we call it python-utils.c or something else, instead? IMO having >> > different naming for the source file and object is very confusing. >> >> Actually I prefer to keep it this way. I am following the existing >> convention used to build other GDB components which live in their own >> subdirectories (cli/, mi/ and tui/). >> >> Since by the end of this patch series there will be 13 Python-related .c >> and .h files, I prefer to put them in their own subdirectory. IMHO having >> a flat source tree, with all source files lumped together, is more >> confusing than an object file named differently (but not much) than its >> source file. > > That's not what I meant. Leaving it in python/ is fine. But call it > python/python-utils.c. All the cli/ sources are prefixed, ditto the > mi/ sources. Ah, got it. Fine by me. Thanks for your suggestions. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center