From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30740 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2008 17:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 30689 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2008 17:30:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:52 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KCeFB-0000cP-LZ for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:49 +0000 Received: from 78.158.192.230 ([78.158.192.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:49 +0000 Received: from vladimir by 78.158.192.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:49 +0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [MI non-stop 0/11] Series overview Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200806282033.28441.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Vladimir Prus >> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:33:27 +0400 >> >> >> I'm about to post, finally, the set of patches that add MI-side support for >> non-stop behaviour. The only dependency is Pedro's core non-stop set. >> >> Actually, Pedro's patches already make basic non-stop >> mode work in MI, and my patches address various, mostly independent, >> issues that are still important to get a frontend that work well. >> >> All patches are ready to be committed, except the patch for enabling non-stop >> with a single command -- that one needs discussion. > > What about documenting the new features? Why do you think the MI non-stop spec and the thread behaviour spec were written? As usual, and even more than usual due to huge amount of text, I'm not going to mess with texinfo until I'm sure nobody has big objections about the behaviour. - Volodya