From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-56852-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4938 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2008 04:11:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 4929 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2008 04:10:59 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:10:29 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) 	id 1KBioT-0005iN-1j 	for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:10:25 +0000
Received: from 78.158.192.230 ([78.158.192.230])         by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:10:25 +0000
Received: from vladimir by 78.158.192.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:10:25 +0000
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
From:  Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Subject:  Re: [non-stop] 01/10 Add "executing" property
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:37:00 -0000
Message-ID:  <g3v4r5$djm$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> <g3u0d1$on$2@ger.gmane.org> <200806252002.27906.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080625191311.GD25575@caradoc.them.org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7Bit
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:02:27PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I'll wait for review on it (as it is the patch that will probably need
>> more adjustement) before making interface changes, OK?
> 
> Speaking for myself, I wouldn't mind getting these patches in and
> then making this sort of change immediately afterwards... I dread
> having to re-review cascading revised patches.

Yes. I think that Pedro's patches are in good shape already, and they
don't break all-stop mode, so it's more efficient to get everything in
and then tweak things, if necessary.

- Volodya