From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28978 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 14:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 28969 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 14:17:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:16:51 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKDk5-0003AE-6f for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:16:45 +0000 Received: from 77.246.241.246 ([77.246.241.246]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:16:45 +0000 Received: from ghost by 77.246.241.246 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:16:45 +0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: [RFA] Use vector for varobj_list_children interface. Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200801171755.47572.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080129215240.GG15063@caradoc.them.org> <200801301019.53604.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <000001c86319$2cfcb3f0$86f61bd0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000101c8631b$aa13cbb0$fe3b6310$@u-strasbg.fr> <20080130131742.GC13702@caradoc.them.org> <20080130140341.GA16745@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:51:56PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: >> >> I think it is the part used by insight >> > >> > Correct. Our position is that Insight is not part of GDB and the GDB >> > developers are not responsible for fixing it; it's unfortunate if it >> > breaks, but the Insight maintainers are generally good about fixing it >> > up later (Keith in particular). >> >> So I don't have to fix this? > > Up to you. I do not personally think it is necessary. Ok. I'll then leave this matter to Insight maintainers. - Volodya