From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52156-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17612 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2007 19:58:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 17604 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2007 19:58:56 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:58:52 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) 	id 1Is1ie-0002zM-39 	for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:46:44 +0000
Received: from 77.246.241.246 ([77.246.241.246])         by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:46:44 +0000
Received: from ghost by 77.246.241.246 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:46:44 +0000
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
From:  Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Subject:  Re: [8/9] multiple locations
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:58:00 -0000
Message-ID:  <fhcuk9$bnh$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <18233.20228.172834.464875@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200711131105.10906.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20071113123812.GA22747@caradoc.them.org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7Bit
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:05:10AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> > 
>> > Does the (p) add anything useful to the user?  The manual says:
>> > 
>> >       An optional `(p)' suffix marks pending breakpoints
>> > 
>> > Is that not clear from the word PENDING?
>> 
>> No, because if you set breakpoint in a shared library, and that library
>> is unloaded, you have some number in 'address' field, but the breakpoint
>> won't actually fire, and the "(p)" indicates that fact.
> 
> Can we just change it back to <PENDING> by discarding the address?

This can actually work. I'll try to implement this idea.

- Volodya