Jim Blandy wrote:

> 
> Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs.msu.su> writes:
>> After pending breakpoints were changed for better, a number of
>> functions have 'pending_bp' parameter that is not used in any
>> way. This patch removes it. OK?
>>
>> (I'll write ChangeLog entry if this patch is approved)
> 
> Looks good to me; please commit.

Thanks. The final patch with changelog is attached.
 
> (This patch was mechanical and touched a number of functions, so I can
> understand why you'd rather put off writing the ChangeLog entry for
> it.  But in general, a patch should be posted with a ChangeLog entry:
> it helps reviewers understand the patch, and of course the entry is
> subject to review itself.)

It's this a bit too pedantic, for this case? This is as mechanical patch
as it can get, so ChangeLog won't have much value in understanding the patch.

- Volodya