From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13558 invoked by alias); 25 May 2018 18:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13541 invoked by uid 89); 25 May 2018 18:47:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:47:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683F240122A1; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C296353C; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFA 4/4] Remove interp_name To: Tom Tromey References: <20180430051207.19979-1-tom@tromey.com> <20180430051207.19979-5-tom@tromey.com> <0b5df1d7-ea68-8bb0-bbdf-6a370b35042c@redhat.com> <874liv1st7.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 19:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <874liv1st7.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00699.txt.bz2 On 05/25/2018 07:41 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> Not sure. The name is supposedly read-only, which would > Pedro> suggest renaming the field to m_name and adding a name() > Pedro> getter. WDYT? > > How about the appended as a follow-up patch to this series? Thanks, looks good. Pedro Alves