From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 2J3zIpb/U2EKJAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:54:30 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 89C651EE27; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:54:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330D91EE24 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212F3858004 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:54:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8212F3858004 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1632894869; bh=kCJ5xerDxyyqm1p0I4NhYJpUO2GLqe+wWW+fqW3h7/Q=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=kD56iZinQ2NkhBoH/9dyjqxRg1QXokFGOSaJjwlTuTQzv5xs1iKJ5I2/l/hbEyBnZ SZ6q4Rojv4E3pT8DLZW6fr64MHoP95b97f8FcqvSMHPBzv9YwIbEJ6A5yxEPQoAHHV fGNc6Oc9S+E6eP8WTW3WHWuDY2Fx+g3yqAvpxNig= Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA1C3858D35 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:54:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BDA1C3858D35 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 369C3240026 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:54:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HK5Cz3jBrz9rxG; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] gdb: Move construct_inferior_arguments to gdbsupport To: Simon Marchi , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200429111638.1327262-1-m.weghorn@posteo.de> <20200520162115.713005-1-m.weghorn@posteo.de> <09d143d7-f003-ee72-7922-7102772b4f08@posteo.de> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:53:59 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Michael Weghorn via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Michael Weghorn Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 28/09/2021 16.33, Simon Marchi wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Can you take a look at this bug? > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28392 > > Thanks, > > Simon > Hi Simon, yes, I hope to find some time later today or tomorrow to take a closer look. I must admit I was not aware gdbserver supports shell argument globbing and variable substitution. Michael