From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251463893679 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:45:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 251463893679 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D37C1F068; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:45:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][PR gdb/15559] Use thiscall calling convention for class members To: Hannes Domani , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200429134808.3642-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> <20200429134808.3642-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:45:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200429134808.3642-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:45:35 -0000 > @@ -234,6 +264,8 @@ i386_windows_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch) > { > i386_windows_init_abi_common (info, gdbarch); > windows_init_abi (info, gdbarch); > + > + set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, i386_windows_push_dummy_call); > } Just to be sure, this call convention does not apply to Cygwin programs? Simon