From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49057 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2019 14:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 49045 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2019 14:40:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:508 X-HELO: mail-wm1-f48.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f48.google.com) (209.85.128.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:40:40 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id e16so3021887wme.1 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm39314175wra.77.2019.03.14.07.40.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC 8.3 0/3] Some style fixes To: Tom Tromey , Eli Zaretskii References: <20190308210433.32683-1-tromey@adacore.com> <83pnr08tc8.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhq26fcw.fsf@gnu.org> <874l899nh3.fsf@tromey.com> <8336ns3uv4.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1h23hat.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvg5fxzp.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: tromey@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tvg5fxzp.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 On 03/14/2019 12:20 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Eli> +#ifdef __MINGW32__ > Eli> +#include > Eli> +static SHORT ncurses_norm_attr; > Eli> +#endif > > I'd somewhat prefer it if the definition were in a separate block after > all the includes. > Me too. It would help with the "namespace gdb" effort as well, since the variable will be braced under "namespace gdb" while the header won't. Thanks, Pedro Alves