From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71435 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2019 15:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 71427 invoked by uid 89); 15 Oct 2019 15:23:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:23:15 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21697B708; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release: Start of stabilization period ? To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Christian Biesinger , gdb-patches References: <20191012191938.GA2675@adacore.com> <9d160e13-fd9e-e886-2709-2a7ea29cae93@suse.de> <20191015152012.GB13252@adacore.com> From: Tom de Vries Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191015152012.GB13252@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 On 15-10-2019 17:20, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Here's my wishlist: >> - [gdb/tdep] Fix 'Unexpected register class' assert in >> amd64_push_arguments >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00293.html > > Fixing asserts are always nice to have for releases :-) > Yeah :) >> - [gdb/tdep] Fix inferior call arg passing for amd64 >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00307.html >> - [gdb] Only force INTERP_CONSOLE ui_out for breakpoint commands in MI >> mode >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00099.html >> - [gdb/symtab] Prefer var def over decl >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00161.html > > These look fine in principle as well. > > I can't review the patches in detail, but I did noticed on the last > one that you're adding functions without adding documentation for them. > Correct, Andrew also noticed that, that was fixed already and resubmitted using Gerrit. Thanks, - Tom