From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37110 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 19:28:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 37100 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 19:28:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=np, Hx-languages-length:457 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:28:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0E0180B2A; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5FD5D964; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix setting-breakpoints regression on PPC64 (function descriptors) (was: Re: ppc64 regression: [PATCH 1/2] Fix "list amb To: Ulrich Weigand References: <20171129191948.A7DF7D80320@oc3748833570.ibm.com> Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Simon Marchi , Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171129191948.A7DF7D80320@oc3748833570.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00791.txt.bz2 On 11/29/2017 07:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. Here's a patch that implements >> something like that. WDYT? > > Yes, this looks all good to me. Thanks for taking care of this! Alright, now pushed. N.p., and sorry for the breakage in the first place. Thanks, Pedro Alves