On 08-04-2020 13:03, Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > When running test-case gdb.ada/dgopt.exp with target board > unix/-flto/-O0/-flto-partition=none/-ffat-lto-objects and gcc-8, gcc-9 or > gcc-10, and the tentative fix for PR25700 ( > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167451.html ), we run > into this regression: > ... > (gdb) list x.adb:16, 16^M > No source file named x.adb.^M > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/dgopt.exp: list x.adb:16, 16 > ... > > The reason for the failure is that without the tentative fix for PR25700, we > have an unshared psymtab: > ... > { psymtab gdb.ada/dgopt/x.adb ((struct partial_symtab *) $hex)^M > readin no^M > fullname (null)^M > text addresses 0x0 -- 0x0^M > psymtabs_addrmap_supported yes^M > globals (none)^M > statics (none)^M > dependencies (none)^M > }^M > ... > and a shared psymtab (with user field set): > ... > { psymtab gdb.ada/dgopt/x.adb ((struct partial_symtab *) $hex)^M > readin no^M > fullname (null)^M > text addresses 0x0 -- 0x0^M > psymtabs_addrmap_supported yes^M > globals (none)^M > statics (none)^M > user @0x159a ((struct partial_symtab *) 0x37b57c0)^M > dependencies (none)^M > }^M > ... > > The tentative fix for PR25700 removes the unshared psymtab. > > Then when trying to find a psymtab matching x.adb in > psym_map_symtabs_matching_filename, we run into this continue for the shared > psymtab: > ... > for (partial_symtab *pst : require_partial_symbols (objfile, true)) > { > /* We can skip shared psymtabs here, because any file name will be > attached to the unshared psymtab. */ > if (pst->user != NULL) > continue; > ... > and consequently cannot find the file. > > Fix this by not skipping the shared symtab in > psym_map_symtabs_matching_filename. > > Build and reg-tested on x86_64-linux. > > The test-case passes on master, starts failing with the tentative patch for > PR25700, and passes again with this patch. > Oops, now actually with test-case, and ChangeLog entries added. OK for trunk? Thanks, - Tom