From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id iNrhEGgRk2EIWwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:03:20 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 42CBB1F0C1; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:03:20 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCB71EDEE for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:03:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579743857C67 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:03:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 579743857C67 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1637028199; bh=g8XjlJB5HoEx0ERgAyER6iOsRlk+Cqvj5CFJeE56G8I=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=i/T05qNIp2+MHunAp4cM/IdyhrOu0nHwNzMljCxdg34Ux+tLVZ6araDBOmpCGtddE 9axvYYUUzgRNs8iZtrtedzAs9vJ1dr5ALXp8DVSN//Ra7KaZE7e6Q0rslrfR1gvxYq G9iuU9ilNzMneZ00n30rDmrdBQt/Ad4qgao7NOEg= Received: from mail.efficios.com (mail.efficios.com [167.114.26.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6EB33857C71 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:02:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D6EB33857C71 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D3439A48C; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Dul1GKyOuFre; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B530F39A48B; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:48 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com B530F39A48B X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail03.efficios.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AQM_GzQ2C2nD; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 864A239A31A; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:02:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: fix gdbarch_tdep ODR violation Content-Language: en-US To: Luis Machado , will schmidt , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, John Baldwin References: <20211112204233.4108340-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <6f000cddd5fa3bb69f7321667a3aab83225531e9.camel@vnet.ibm.com> <3eb3037d-2d40-d156-a8df-1c0447a9efaf@efficios.com> <1af2a07d-43ee-20ff-4a6c-0d422503c2e0@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1af2a07d-43ee-20ff-4a6c-0d422503c2e0@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-11-15 18:19, Luis Machado wrote: > Yeah. I do see some breakage for native arm/aarch64 as well. Do you think it might be easier to revert then re-validate the new patch. I suppose some targets are tricky to build native files for. I have a patch almost ready to send, I'm testing it on as many configurations as I can reasonably can, then I'll push it. For the configurations I can't build, I'll do my best. If there are still errors, they should be obvious to fix. Simon