From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-133564-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 53323 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2016 02:14:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 53189 invoked by uid 89); 30 Sep 2016 02:14:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:tbsaund, U*tbsaunde, tbsaundetbsaundeorg, tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:14:26 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAA87EAA1;	Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:14:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8U2EM3J011456;	Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:14:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA 17/22] Remove make_cleanup_restore_current_uiout
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org>
References: <1474949330-4307-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1474949330-4307-18-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <20160929120428.rwtvs6i4zyzxrvmp@ball> <87eg42by2q.fsf@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <f30126c7-4b47-698d-cc16-ad7dbb4e64d8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:45:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87eg42by2q.fsf@tromey.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2

On 09/29/2016 03:05 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Trevor" == Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org> writes:
> 
> Trevor> isn't this just scoped_restore<ui_out *> ? why do you need a separate
> Trevor> class?
> 
> In an earlier thread there was a discussion of not having this cleanup
> be over-general -- that is, it was intentionally specific to just
> current_uiout.

how about:

struct scoped_restore_current_uiout : public scoped_restore<ui_out *>
{
  scoped_restore_current_uiout ()
    : scoped_restore (&current_uiout)
  {}
};

?

Thanks,
Pedro Alves