Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Return correct thread for cached event
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 13:51:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2991f10-3c8c-42e0-8532-490ebe113b39@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902180928.3545493-1-tromey@adacore.com>

On 2026-09-02 19:09, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Commit 2e1aacf15a9 ("Windows gdb+gdbserver: Make current_event
> per-thread state") introduced a regression.  This was detected by the
> AdaCore internal test suite in a somewhat unusual configuration: when
> using "attach" with a 32-bit Windows process, an extra stop would be
> generated, like:
> 
>     (gdb) break break_me
>     Breakpoint 1 at 0x1211a04: file pck.adb, line 18.
>     (gdb) continue
>     Continuing.
> 
>     Thread 4 received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
>     [Switching to thread 4 (Thread 6652)]
>     0x77034210 in ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart () from C:/Windows/SysWOW64/ntdll.dll
> 
> Here, we expect to stop in break_me, but instead stop in some Windows
> DLL.
> 
> I tracked this down to this hunk in the aforementioned commit:
> 
> -      return debug_event_ptid (&windows_process.current_event);
> +      return ptid_t (windows_process.process_id,
> +		     windows_process.main_thread_id, 0);
> 
> What happens here is that the "cached" stop ends up being reported in
> the main thread, rather than whatever thread actually caused this
> stop.

Ouch, sorry about this.  And thanks for all the investigation.

I must have very early on in the non-stop work assumed that the initial events
all come from the main thread, but later on I learned that they don't (I even
ran into that very nasty bug that led to the state => internal_state split), and
missed this assumption here.

> 
> This patch fixes the problem by arranging to also cache the thread
> ptid.
> 
> I am not sure whether the call to switch_to_thread here is really
> needed; but since other returns seem to switch the thread, I thought
> this one ought to as well.
> 
> I tested this using the AdaCore internal test suite.
> 
> As this is a regression, when it lands I also plan to apply it to the
> gdb 18 branch.
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34583

Approved-by: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 18:09 Tom Tromey
2026-09-03 14:15 ` Hannes Domani
2026-09-03 15:06   ` Tom Tromey
2026-09-04 12:51 ` Pedro Alves [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2991f10-3c8c-42e0-8532-490ebe113b39@palves.net \
    --to=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox