Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: fix race condition in gdb.replay/missing-thread.c
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 10:24:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f03a2fd0-ae4d-4e16-9cdf-3ec4107f16e4@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260206175807.631814-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>

Ping.

On 2/6/26 12:57 PM, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca wrote:
> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
> 
> I get frequent failures in gdb.replay/missing-thread.exp, starting with:
> 
>     FAIL: gdb.replay/missing-thread.exp: non_stop=on: record_initial_logfile: continue (timeout)
> 
> I tracked this down to a race condition in the test program, causing it
> not to generate the expected SIGTRAP.  This can be reproduced by adding
> a sleep(1) just after the pthread_create.
> 
> The expected behavior is:
> 
>  - The main thread starts a second thread
>  - The main thread blocks on pthread_cond_wait, waiting to be notified
>    by the second thread (to make sure the second thread had time to
>    start)
>  - The second thread notifies the main thread using pthread_cond_signal
>  - The main thread sends a SIGTRAP to the second thread
> 
> However, this can happen:
> 
>  - The main thread starts a second thread
>  - The second thread calls pthread_cond_signal, while no one is waiting
>    to the condvar
>  - The main thread blocks on pthread_cond_wait forever
> 
> Fix it by introducing a separate boolean predicate protected by the
> shared mutex, and looping until it is true.  This is the way
> pthread_cond_wait is meant to be used. From pthread_cond_wait(3):
> 
>     When using condition variables there is always a boolean predicate
>     involving shared variables associated with each condition wait that
>     is true if the thread should proceed. Spurious wakeups from the
>     pthread_cond_wait() or pthread_cond_timedwait() functions may occur.
>     Since the return from pthread_cond_wait() or
>     pthread_cond_timedwait() does not imply anything about the value of
>     this predicate, the predicate should be re-evaluated upon such
>     return.
> 
> Finally, make things static, just out of principle, and fix minor
> formatting issues.
> 
> Change-Id: I62ba2085a2d506dc3d91e32cd5de48c43a3ff55e
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.replay/missing-thread.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.replay/missing-thread.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.replay/missing-thread.c
> index 0a17be1c7dd1..aad6396f24c2 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.replay/missing-thread.c
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.replay/missing-thread.c
> @@ -22,23 +22,28 @@
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  
> -pthread_mutex_t g_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> -pthread_cond_t g_condvar = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
> +static pthread_mutex_t g_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> +static pthread_cond_t g_condvar = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
> +static bool g_ready = false;
>  
> -void *
> +static void *
>  worker_function (void *arg)
>  {
>    printf ("In worker, about to notify\n");
> +
> +  pthread_mutex_lock (&g_mutex);
> +  g_ready = true;
> +  pthread_mutex_unlock (&g_mutex);
>    pthread_cond_signal (&g_condvar);
>  
>    while (true)
> -    sleep(1);
> +    sleep (1);
>  
>    return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  int
> -main()
> +main ()
>  {
>    pthread_t my_thread;
>  
> @@ -46,7 +51,8 @@ main()
>    assert (result == 0);
>  
>    pthread_mutex_lock (&g_mutex);
> -  pthread_cond_wait (&g_condvar, &g_mutex);
> +  while (!g_ready)
> +    pthread_cond_wait (&g_condvar, &g_mutex);
>  
>    printf ("In main, have been woken.\n");
>    pthread_mutex_unlock (&g_mutex);
> 
> base-commit: deb47060b5812c6c41ecc790cb28898fcbc45c93
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-20 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-06 17:57 simon.marchi
2026-02-20 15:24 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2026-02-20 19:05 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-20 19:44   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f03a2fd0-ae4d-4e16-9cdf-3ec4107f16e4@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox