Vladimir Prus wrote:

>>> I've also noticed that while for structures, we don't compare old
>>> and new values, and never report varobj corresponding to structure as
>>> changed, we do all that for references to structures. This patch fixes
>>> both problems, OK?
>> 
>> This is included in the C++ references patch I just reviewed, right?
> 
> Grr, right. I meant to post them as completely separate patches to ease
> review, but messed that up and you've reviewed combined patch.
> 
> My only excuse is that I'll still commit those as separate patches, so
> that at least the history is right.

Here's the version of the patch that was just checked in. Differs only
by extra check_typedef, per your other email.

- Volodya