From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46496-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31070 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2006 20:33:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 31058 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2006 20:33:29 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:33:21 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) 	id 1Gs3SA-0002vk-7S 	for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:33:18 +0100
Received: from 73-198.umostel.ru ([82.179.73.198])         by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:33:18 +0100
Received: from ghost by 73-198.umostel.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))         id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00         for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:33:18 +0100
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
From:  Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Subject:  Re: MI: fix base members in references
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:33:00 -0000
Message-ID:  <el79e9$kjf$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <200611291555.42209.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20061205204447.GC25572@nevyn.them.org> <el6116$9nf$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061206203016.GA30520@adacore.com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7Bit
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

Joel Brobecker wrote:

> Volodya,
> 
>> >> If this patch is fine, can I also commit it to 6.6 branch? The bug in
>> >> question is quite problematic for C++ code.
>> > 
>> > Sounds fine to me, but check with Joel.
>> 
>> I'll check.
> 
> This patch:
> 
>> 2006-12-06  Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
>> 
>>        * varobj.c (cplus_value_of_child): When accessing
>>        base suboject, don't specially process references.
>        
> is OK for the branch.

Thanks!

> Do we have a testcase for that, btw?

We don't. As I've mentioned, we've short of MI/C++ testcases. My other
references patch adds MI/C++/varobj testcase, after committing that patch
I'll also add tests for base/references problem.

- Volodya