From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2775 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2006 15:54:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2764 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2006 15:54:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:54:08 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GpRkX-0006jZ-QH for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:31 +0100 Received: from 73-198.umostel.ru ([82.179.73.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:29 +0100 Received: from ghost by 73-198.umostel.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:29 +0100 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: MI docs: remove historic note Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200611151735.25903.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Vladimir Prus >> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:35:25 +0300 >> >> This patch removes that text. Now section on variable object starts with >> explanation what is variable object -- which looks quite reasonable. >> >> OK? > > Please just enclose the text in @ignore..@end ignore, instead of > removing it altogether. If no one complains in a couple of GDB > releases, we will later remove it. Why is it better than removing? The text is there in CVS in case we need to resurrect it. - Volodya