Re: Variable objects laziness

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-28T17:09:13Z

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 12:48:05PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> >> + rather value_contents, will take care of this.
> >> + It might throw, but unlike var-update for -var-assign
> >> + there's just one variable we're working it, so we don't
> >> + need to catch the exception here. */
> >
> > Wait, what? gdb_value_assign will never throw. value_contents
> > might, but gdb_value_assign will catch it.
>
> Yep, confused gdb_value_assign with value_assign.
>
> Updated patch attached. I also attach the delta to the previous patch.

This version is OK now (for HEAD only). Thanks for your patience.
The frozen varobj patch had some further discussion; I'll have to
get back to it, but I'm afraid not today. Poke me if I haven't done it
in a few days, please.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery