From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id iv4mD16NJGPF1ToAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:51:10 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2B6F11E112; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:51:10 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ykky83lM; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85ACD1E0D3 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12943821FD8 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:51:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A12943821FD8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1663339865; bh=bUnha43jhIbxrhUmRfHbanx0xr69c63GX4VqQOjct7o=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=ykky83lMDJJSnfZu5moqYUlhg1YKrZIqXWeQtHJnptDXFww+qvgLvpE5A/hoambvk nmhVDHhBwdrHo4fTP7M0bZwJhYiTjSh725W+hHI8VpHZAGNjdwn99cTqcx+mlAeNdj h3uzumc9fS8jNoXhhaYTtki8b0gRiI7z2AmXTIiE= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1909A3853545 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:50:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1909A3853545 Received: from [10.9.7.166] (vpn-konference.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FFA71E0D3; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:50:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:50:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][gdb] Handle pending ^C after rl_callback_read_char To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220913125619.GA15500@delia.home> <9c5a599c-faf3-940b-745b-3528cd72fcdb@simark.ca> <30fdc4c1-b19e-d850-6fb1-2ebc811de1db@suse.de> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: <30fdc4c1-b19e-d850-6fb1-2ebc811de1db@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 9/16/22 10:28, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: > On 9/13/22 16:32, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote: >> Ack, I'll wait a bit for more comments, and then commit.  Then we can refer to current gdb source code when posing the question about readline. > > I've committed, and send an email to bug-readline.  I don't see it yet in the archives. > > Thanks, > - Tom Here it is: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-09/msg00001.html Thanks for following up. Simon