Re: [PATCH v3 06/17] Replace delete_longjmp_breakpoint_cleanup with a forward_scope_exit type

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 01/24/2019 11:23 AM, Pavel I. Kryukov wrote:
> The patch causes build errors on XCode:
> 
> $ clang --version
> Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.5)
> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin17.7.0
> Thread model: posix
> InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode10.1.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin

Thanks.

Hmm, I only have clang 5.0.2 handy, and I think it links with
libstdc++ instead of clang's own libc++.  Here it builds fine.
I had also made sure the patch builds fine with g++ 4.8.

> 
> 
> In file included from breakpoint.c:34:
> In file included from ./inferior.h:54:
> ./common/forward-scope-exit.h:98:7: error: no matching constructor for
> initialization of 'decltype(std::bind(&delete_longjmp_breakpoint,
> std::declval<int>()))' (aka '__bind<void (*)(int), int>')
>     : m_bind_function (std::bind (function, args...))
>       ^                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./common/gdb_optional.h:155:19: note: in instantiation of member
> function 'detail::forward_scope_exit<void (int),
> &delete_longjmp_breakpoint, void (int)>::forward_scope_exit' requested
> here
>     new (&m_item) T (std::forward<Args>(args)...);
>                   ^
> breakpoint.c:11127:18: note: in instantiation of function template
> specialization 'gdb::optional<detail::forward_scope_exit<void (int),
> &delete_longjmp_breakpoint, void (int)> >::emplace<int &>' requested
> here
>       lj_deleter.emplace (thread);
>                  ^
> /Applications/Xcode-10.1.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/include/c++/v1/functional:2220:7:
> note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not
> viable: no known conversion from '__bind<[...], int &>' to 'const
> __bind<[...], int>' for 1st argument
> class __bind
>       ^

Hmm, references to the copy ctor.  I don't really know why I ended up
with a copy here.  We can just pass the arguments directly to the
being-constructed bind.  Does this work for you?

From b1caeb9c5334a59680af7b7717ab620e5a912bcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:25:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] No copy ctor

---
 gdb/common/forward-scope-exit.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/common/forward-scope-exit.h b/gdb/common/forward-scope-exit.h
index 8d639151a4..bffc6e683b 100644
--- a/gdb/common/forward-scope-exit.h
+++ b/gdb/common/forward-scope-exit.h
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ class forward_scope_exit<Function, function, Res (Args...)>
 
 public:
   explicit forward_scope_exit (Args ...args)
-    : m_bind_function (std::bind (function, args...))
+    : m_bind_function (function, args...)
   {
     /* Nothing.  */
   }
-- 
2.14.4