From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FA3385E830 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:29:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E8FA3385E830 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 717411E791; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: texinfo remove broken links Previous and Up from contents To: Eli Zaretskii , Jonny Grant Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <9a670cec-ee22-8d98-47d5-4876b9ca7c58@jguk.org> <83a71qlzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <831rmo70wx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:29:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <831rmo70wx.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:29:48 -0000 On 2020-06-09 10:45 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Jonny Grant >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:51:55 +0100 >> >>>> * doc/gdb.texinfo: Remove broken links Previous and Up from contents >>> >>> Thanks, this is OK, except that the ChangeLog entry should end with a >>> period. >> >> Hi eli, >> >> Would you like me to re-send it? > > No, it just needs to be fixed by whoever pushes this change. > Eli, since you reviewed it and Jonny doesn't have push access, would you mind pushing it? Thanks, Simon