From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>,
Vinod Kathail <vinodk@xilinx.com>,
Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum@xilinx.com>,
Nagaraju Mekala <nmekala@xilinx.com>
Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e70c77de-3fcb-4a23-b6d0-6ce4b8106841@BY2FFO11FD050.protection.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B1488B.7070007@redhat.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:53 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Michael Eager; Vinod Kathail; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
On 06/30/2014 12:13 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:25 PM
> To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Michael Eager; Vinod Kathail;
> Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
> Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
>
> On 06/30/2014 11:32 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>> Signed-off-by:Ajit Agarwal ajitkum@xilinx.com
>>
>>>> In this case is it correct to say
>>>> If (tdesc == NULL)
>>>> tdesc = tdesc_microblaze;
>>>>
>>>> instead of tdesc_microblaze_with_stack_protect?
>>>>>> Yes.
>> Instead of tdesc_microblaze_with_stack_protect if I use tdesc_microblaze the "G Packet message is too long" error is not resolved.
>
>>> Then it sounds like the G packet size guesses you're adding aren't actually triggering. Why?
>
> I have checked the guesses are actually triggering as it works fine
> with backward compatibility with the Designs there is no stack-protect registers. For the Design that has the Stack protect register, it reports the message " G packet too long ".
>>If the G guess is triggering OK, and so GDB picks the description with the stack protect registers based on the G packet size, why would the default target description matter at all? If it >>does, then something sounds broken.
In Microblaze Port the gdbarch_info has tdesc always set to NULL. Thus the gdbarch_init doesn't populates the register info based feature target description. Though the microblaze_register_g_packet_guesses is called by gdbarch_init and register the guesses, but the gdbarch_info.tdesc == NULL always and features target description info is populated based on default target description.
>>What are you doing different from the other ports that use this mechanism?
In Microblaze port as compared to other architecture port lacking the function microblaze_read_description which sets the tdesc and the architecture set up based the Linux Kernel and Ptrace parameters. The other architecture like ARM and MIPS has arm_read_description and arm_linux_read_description which sets the tdesc info current()->Process.
>>Please debug this a bit further.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 8:56 Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-12 14:52 ` Michael Eager
2014-06-17 11:17 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-18 11:06 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-18 14:58 ` Michael Eager
2014-06-18 15:10 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-18 15:30 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-18 15:40 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-18 15:54 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-18 15:57 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-18 19:56 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-23 13:18 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-23 19:36 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-24 9:13 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-24 10:28 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-24 12:06 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-24 12:31 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-24 12:46 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-24 13:27 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-30 10:32 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-30 10:55 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-30 11:13 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-30 11:23 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-30 16:29 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal [this message]
2014-07-01 19:36 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-07-20 12:57 ` Michael Eager
2014-06-30 14:47 ` Michael Eager
2014-07-01 16:07 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-07-01 16:46 ` Michael Eager
2014-07-02 10:40 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
2014-06-24 14:11 ` Michael Eager
2014-06-25 13:00 ` Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e70c77de-3fcb-4a23-b6d0-6ce4b8106841@BY2FFO11FD050.protection.gbl \
--to=ajit.kumar.agarwal@xilinx.com \
--cc=eager@eagercon.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nmekala@xilinx.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=vidhum@xilinx.com \
--cc=vinodk@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox