From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100643 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2018 15:01:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 100619 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2018 15:01:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*UA:Roundcube, H*u:Roundcube, Hx-languages-length:836, H*UA:1.3.6 X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:01:33 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w7QF1Qu9015093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:01:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id ACC8F1ECDF; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:01:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F23C1E52D; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:01:24 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:01:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore behavior of disabling address randomization by default on GDBserver In-Reply-To: <20180826095056.GA8675@adacore.com> References: <1534953958-13064-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <1ad11ede-9a61-5ead-921a-bf2c1c1a6358@redhat.com> <20180826095056.GA8675@adacore.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00624.txt.bz2 On 2018-08-26 05:50, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > >> > Thanks for fixing this! >> > >> > This is OK, but please double-check the patch/commit, since it >> > seems to include the same hunk twice. Kind of looks like >> > the fix diff made it to the commit log? >> >> Oops yes, it's because I use "git commit -v" and managed to include >> that >> diff in the commit message by mistake. >> >> Pushed with that fixed. > > Just a quick message to let you know that I cherry-picked the patch and > pushed it to gdb-8.2-branch. I think we wanted this to be fixed there, > right? And the patch looked sufficiently obvious to me that I went > ahead. Of course, fixing the bug for 8.2 was the reason for that bug hunt in the first place. Thanks! Simon